Thursday, May 6, 2010

Race, Genetics, and Harvard Law School

Is it reasonable to simply ponder the "possibility," ever so idly and hypothetically, that bad genes might explain African American underachievement? It is a an old and many-told tale, I know, but it just got a fresh re-telling at Harvard Law School this month.

A Harvard Law student recently apologized for comments she emailed to friends and colleagues following what sounds like an intriguing and heated dinner-time discussion about Affirmative Action. After first expressing concern that some of her earlier comments during that aforementioned dinner were misconstrued as politically correct, the student attempted to clarify her take on the matter.

"I absolutely do not rule out the possibility," she wrote, "that African-Americans are, on average, genetically predisposed to be less intelligent."

Claiming that sound research could convince her otherwise, she seemed intent on dispelling any lingering sense among her friends that she might be too timid about the notion of considering potential linkages between race and intelligence.

She went on: "I don't think it is that controversial of an opinion to say that I think it is at least possible that African-Americans are less intelligent on a genetic level. And I didn't mean to shy away from that position at dinner."

The student then ended her email with a joke. "Please don't pull a Larry Summers on me," citing the firestorm that Harvard's former president caused by broaching the idea that the under-representation of women in math and science might be predicated on their genetic endowment. Summers was eventually forced to resign his post.

After a public reprimand from the law school's dean, Martha Minow, the student apologized for her email and took back her claim about being open to considering possible genetic links between race and intelligence.

"I emphatically do not believe that African-Americans are inferior in any way," she said. "I understand why my words expressing even a doubt in that regard were and are offensive."

But what is she apologizing for? The very thought? Is this an example of "politics" trumping science by deeming certain research questions impossible to ask?

Ironically, the law student appears to have been reprimanded (during that earlier dinner conversation) for a form of political correctness, for not clearly accepting the premise that genetics might explain race-based differences in intelligence (and, by extension, social achievement), a premise that her friends appear to have chastised her for "shy[ing] away from."

This Harvard student's email has been overshadowed by Harvard Professor Skip Gates's recent New York Times op-ed, which is equally controversial in terms of contemporary racial politics. The Gates essay emphasizes African complicities in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade as a way to problematize calls for reparations here in the United States. He asks, somewhat rhetorically, if African nations should by asked to fork over some cash, too.

One reading of the Gates essay (and its critics abound) castigates him for "blaming the victim" and letting Europe and America off the hook, for pretending that every link in chattel slavery's horrible chain carried equal weight.

Of course, it is easy enough to read genetic explanations for racial achievement gaps as another way of blaming victims (and, in that case, their biological makeup), of letting real (social and political) culprits off the hook. If racial thinking is "bad biology" (as social constructionists and many physical anthropologists currently proclaim), we should be suspicious of any too-easy and essentialist invocation of racial groups as "natural" hooks on which to hang causal claims about inequality.

Gates isn't going to apologize for his (post-racial?) reading of history, and some people won't accept this law student's attempt at an apology. But, again, why is this student apologizing at all? That's one of the most important questions we can ask. Is it simply for offending African-Americans? For invoking race as nature rather than nurture? For racial insensitivity? For fear of being labelled a racist? And why do we often invoke genetics as some kind of holy grail that can reduce the messy machinations of everyday life to ostensible irrelevance? What kind of irrationality might that represent?


Anonymous said...

av女優性愛台灣性愛自影片性愛巴士線上看sex性愛85cc性愛小摩女自天堂色情免費線上影色情貼圖分享色情貼圖免費看色情貼圖庫色情貼影區色情愛片色情照片免費看色情遊戲色情電影賞色情圖片色情圖貼區色情圖網站色情圖影片色情漫畫天堂色情貼無色情貼區色情貼片免費看色情免費線上影片色情言情小說色情拍貼色情相片色情美女遊戲色情做愛電影色情動慢武俠小說 亂倫小說 視訊情色論壇

Arnold said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.


Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Just do it!.......................................................

Anonymous said...

sex貼片,姦淫小說 高雄視訊34C援交妹AIO 成人視訊jeyn 美女交友豆豆情色視訊 情色文學成人小說,情趣 av博物館 網愛交友qk176 一葉晴語音聊天網av127 hi5 tv 免費影片 173視訊聊天 777成人 硬弟弟論壇 影音交友616 聊天室13060免費 104廖家儀自拍外流 24h免費成人頻道 0204movie免費影片 s18x色網 辣妹影片直播av無碼 aio交友愛情館視訊交友90739 台北聊天交友 援助交際聊天室 嗆辣妹影音視訊聊天室 做愛影片 洪爺影城 辣妹自拍哈尼視訊 台南援交友留言 情惑用品性易購 哈尼視訊,鹹濕視訊 0401遊戲線上 sex女優王國自拍 qq 視訊交友 美女交友影音視訊聊天室 辣妹視訊網 無碼卡通,無碼a片 104自拍 部落格 遊戲區 免費視訊-美女館 34c辣妹影片直播 豆豆情色風暴視訊 給我棒棒 sexy girl,mm視訊kk視訊 85cc辣妹視訊 台灣妹色網 dudu嘟嘟成人網 成人圖片 77p2p影片區 無碼 av影片 視訊聊天 影片 寫真 080台灣名模討論區 視訊網愛聊天室 正妹牆qk176

函松 said...

hello~ nice to meet u..............

Anonymous said...

量力而為,別勉強了,Cut your coat according to your cloth...................................................

采瑩采瑩 said...


yuzhen said...

high heel shoes
promotional moto v3tiffany jewelry
swarovski crystals suppliers
bluetooth adapter
E Cigarette
brand cell phones
fashion jordan shoes
step up converter
buy acekard 2i
Swarovski Crystal Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Anonymous said...

Microsoft Office
Office 2010
Microsoft Office 2010
Office 2010 key
Office 2010 download
Office 2010 Professional
Microsoft outlook
Outlook 2010
Windows 7
Microsoft outlook 2010