I never understood the phrase, "you can't win for losing." Not really. I assume that it implies something like "without bad luck, I'd have no luck at all," the assumption that some people would only win anything if we gave out awards for Best Loser.
Obama recently lost his bid to help Chicago host the Olympics, but he clearly is a "winner," and that was even before he beat McCain in the last presidential election.
But the Nobel folks have taken his winningness to entirely new heights, and some detractors are confused (and insulted) by their recent decision--an attempt, some say, to counteract that Olympic snub or to thumb noses at the last Bush regime.
My brainstorm colleague Laurie Fendrich has already beaten me to the punch with her provocative and "political" contextualization of this morning's Nobel announcement. But I still wanted to add another inflection to this morning's Obama buzz, and it is predicated on the twitterati's tongue-in-cheek responses to Obama's newest win.
In a thread called ReasonsBHHwonNPP, here are some of the TwitterWorld's answers:
Because he fostered a friendship between a black professor and a white police officer.
For restoring US rep because they couldn't kick Bush a Nobel War prize on the way out the door.
Because he didn't smack Joe Wilson.
Because a beer in the rose garden is a revolutionary way to broker peace.
Because he has directed american military might toward our common enemy: the Moon.
Because the Arizona State University board of trustees weren't voting.
Because going for the Nobel Prize is like a race and well, he is half Kenyan.
Because anyone who has to deal w/Am Politics tday & hasnt punched anyone in the face deserves it.
And I know that Chronicle readers could undoubtedly add some zingers of their own. Indeed, Obama probably would have preferred not winning this particular prize, just because so many people are going to spend their time further demonizing him for it.
"Don't hate the playa," hip-hop MCs advise. "Hate the game." That's another colloquial saying that seems very appropriate today.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment